Modify by all means but please keep it sensible


Author: Martin PortPublished:

I recently spent time with another classic car owner and enthusiast whose ambition (or so it seemed) was to rip the heart out of a good proportion of the classics he came across and fit something ‘better’.

By that, I mean something that is better on fuel and perhaps a bit more powerful – nothing necessarily wrong with that, but what concerned me was the fact that in all of the cases mentioned, he was talking about modern diesel BMW lumps (or similar) that could then be ‘chipped’ to get the most out of them.

Now before you call me a ‘stick in the mud’ or accuse me of being all fuddy-duddy, I’m not against modifications. If there is something that will make your classic a little more reliable or usable then fine: electronic ignition is just one case in point that I have fitted to most of my classics.

But, would I ever consider putting a diesel engine and six-speed gearbox out of a rep-mobile into a Morris Minor? In a word, no.

Of course, this is just an example, and I don’t even know if you could make that particular combination fit, but I personally would struggle to entertain any mod that changes the original character of a classic beyond recognition and by default, creates a completely different driving experience.

Back when I had my Morris Traveller, fitting various Morris Marina components was the done thing in order to gain a bit more oomph.

A Fiat twin-cam engine in the front was also commonplace for a bit more power. However, even though now these modifications come across as sounding ‘fairly’ suitable, at the time I baulked at such ‘savagery’. Why buy a Moggie at all if you didn’t want to watch the world go by at a stately pace while relishing that delightfully light gearchange?

Back to the modern day though, and I seem to have spent an awful amount of time looking at Series I Land-Rovers for sale. Every time eBay pings up a new listing though, it seems to have the dreaded ‘hybrid’ word attached to it. In this instance it nearly always means that what should be a lovely original-looking Series I, is instead half a Series I body plonked atop a coil-sprung chassis and running a huge V8 or a TD5 diesel.

I won’t dream of arguing against the fact that it may ride better, go faster and be more efficient than the original 1.6 litre four-pot, but if I want to buy a Series I, then I don’t want it to ride and sound like a Defender or Discovery!

For me, classic cars are all about character – the good bits and the bad bits. When I had the gearbox on my old ’67 MGB rebuilt, it was presumed I would like to introduce syncromesh on first gear until I insisted that it was kept original. I kind of liked the quirkiness of having to come to a stop before engaging first gear, or learning the art of double-declutching in order to drive the car ‘properly’ and for me, the car would have lost a little charm if that had been eradicated in the rebuild.

Of course by writing this I am fully aware that I sound like a ‘rivet-counter’, but I’m not. I’m also impressed by people such as the enthusiast mentioned at the start who have the ability and ingenuity to explore the engineering possibilities and who, without doubt help to keep the classic car movement alive just as much as someone who restores cars to concours quality, but I’m afraid that on a personal level my heart sinks when the bonnet is lifted and I find a turbocharged Nissan motor in the front of something that looks 40 years older on the outside.

It may be rather bold to suggest, but I think that sometimes people are far too quick to jump to the dramatic ‘solutions’ when it comes to modifying their classic in order to make it perform differently. Most cars will have a whole history of period mods just waiting to be exploited – from engine tuning right down to different wheel combinations, all of which could transform the car without throwing the character out of the window at the same time.

Of course, when I finally buy another Series II Landie it should really have a 200TDi engine under the bonnet so that I can afford to run it and (almost) keep up on the motorway, but I don’t think I can do it. After all, I don’t want to open the bonnet and stare at a plastic covered lump where I can’t even see the oil leaks!



Really liked your introduction picture of the Bond dragster. I had a Bond 3 wheeler mk1 fitted with a single cyl two- stroke motor , with a kick-start mounted on the gearbox. You had to open the hood and stick one leg in the engine compartment to kick the motor over until it started (great in the rain) I painted sharks-teeth round the front like a P40 Tomahawk (flying- tiger). A very scary machine to drive, had a habit of going up on two wheels at roundabouts. Picture :- my old buddy Mark Strattons Bond " Metronome " . If you wanna modify " Do it big !)



rolymo35 comments on a previous  post  re  " Blydenstein power " reference ,  " jump to dramatic solutions  to modify their classics" , is not quite correct ,many of  these cars were modied at a time when they were no-way classic by nature or reputation. In  the case of my Vauxhall Viva 7 litre  GMV8 engined "Thunder- Saloon" ,that was back in the early 1970's a new release in the showrooms and certainly in vogue , had no sporting heritage. A typical Euro-grott box ideal for a massive heart transplant to V8 ( 421 bhp ) muscle power to purposely dramatically alter its characturistics


Coventry Climax

I couldn't agree more with your comments Martin.

Electronic ignition, an alternator instead of a dynamo, radial tyres (although crossplies look a thousand times better) and so on are sensible mods, but anything more drastic than that seems somehow wrong to me.

Add your comment

  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br> <img>
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.

More information about formatting options

You must be logged in to comment
Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.