Goodbye, and good riddance


Author: Tony BakerPublished:

Tony Baker celebrates the demise of the humble tax disc.

So, it’s farewell to the tax disc, those annoying little white blobs on windscreens that have been the bane of car photographers’ lives since 1921. We won’t miss you.

Those of you who have had your car featured in a classic car magazine – well, in this one – will know that, after the introductions and handshakes at the start of a photo shoot, the photographer’s first request is: ‘Can you take the tax disc out, please?’,  to which the inevitable response is  ‘Why?’

To answer the question for what I hope will be one of the last times ever, here are the reasons why car photographers – well , most of us – ask you to take that little disc (and its holder) off the windscreen before we point the camera at your car. Firstly, it appears in the picture not as an indication that you’ve paid your vehicle excise duty but as an ugly white circle that spoils the appearance of your car and ruins its symmetry. You don’t believe me? Try it yourself – take two pictures of your classic, one with the disc and one without. Then ask yourself which one looks best. If you prefer the one with the disc you are either a particularly pedantic police officer or you should have gone to Specsavers.

That’s the aesthetic reason, but there’s a more practical one that has to do with the way magazines are produced. Photo shoots are sometimes done many months in advance of publication, to take advantage of better weather or the availability of cars and their owners.  If we then use a picture across a double-page spread that clearly shows a tax disc that’s expired since the day of the shoot, we get letters from people who have nothing better to do with their time, or are pedantic police officers. 

Some of the more law-abiding classic owners are a bit troubled by the idea of leaving their car unadorned by a tax disc that has, until now, been a legal requirement, even for the brief duration of a magazine photo shoot. So – again, hopefully for the last time – here are the answers to the supplementary questions...
 ‘Could you not just take the tax disc out in Photoshop? ‘ Yes, we could, but to do that on every picture in a feature would take a lot of time compared to the few seconds it takes to peel the holder off of the windscreen. 
‘Can I put it back in before you do the driving shots?’ Please don’t. I’ve lost count of the number of times owners have done this without me noticing. There is no sensible sign language for ‘take your tax disc out again’ that can be understood by a motorist driving past an agitated photographer – trust me, I’ve spent years trying to invent this.

‘What if I get stopped by the police?’ In more than twenty years of taking photographs for Classic & Sports Car, I’ve been stopped just once by the police. On that occasion I was sitting in the boot of a Peugeot 405 with a camera and a flashgun, being driven along Pall Mall at 10.30pm, closely followed by a Rolls-Royce Phantom 3.  The officers concerned somehow failed to notice that the windscreen of my subject wasn’t displaying a tax disc. I can’t think why. Seriously, though, while ‘failure to display’ is (until now) technically an offence I’ve always presumed that if we were unfortunate enough to get pulled over we would be doubly unfortunate to meet a police officer pedantic enough not to acknowledge that a tax disc placed carefully on a passenger seat is, in fact, on display.

There will no doubt be those who mourn the passing of the tax disc. Velologists (Google it) will have to find something else to collect and the users of green ink will have to find something else to write to car magazines about. But us car photographers are celebrating. Now all we need is a ban on owners’ club window stickers...




Totally agree with you on aesthetic grounds Tony. From a safety point of view it also gives us a little more glass to look though when sighting the apex of left-handers. However, I suspect this will give rise to a lot more Police time devoted to sitting by the road with their number plate recognition cameras, as opposed to what we (and they, probably) would like them to be doing. i.e Nicking villains!


Totally disagree!
I don't see anything wrong with a photograph showing a tax disc; they have been part of the motoring scene for so long, and they can provide a useful clue to dating an old photograph.
Many owners retain old tax discs, and they can provide verification of an old cars history, which will now be lost to future owners.
And finally, they provide visual evidence that a car is legally on the road; I don't believe beat bobbies, community officers or parking wardens are, or will be, provided with ANPR facilities, so it will be far easier for poverty car owners to escape the licence fee, and then there will be no need for them to obtain insurance, and then we will all be paying even more...


I mostly agree and Tony is a great car photographer who wrote an excellent book on the subject but there is much more to these changes than just display. As the rules stand then from Wednesday you will not be able to buy a car as a private sale after 6pm and drive it home - because the seller must surrender tax before sale and new buyer must tax the car before driving it. If the car is parked on a public road how is that going to work.  DVLA say you should go to your local post office to buy tax before driving the car away.

The DVLA are a nightmare since the LVLOs were shut last year, currently they have a 4 week delay before even opening post, but their lack of thought and common sense on this is just incredible.

One other issue with modern classics than span the year 2001 when classes changed (for example first gen Honda insight) is some are zero rated and some are £200ish a year and without the disk, unless you have an Internet connection and smartphone, there is no easy way to know.  


Indeed, there is absolutely no doubt that the changes will greatly increase the number of untaxed and uninsured cars on the road.

And the government has added another scam to the 'rebate for each full month remaining' con: the fact that road tax cannot be transferred to a car's new owner means, of course, that the new owner will have to tax the car from the beginning of the month in which the car is bought. So, you won't even be able to give the RFL to your buyer even if it's only valid until the end of the month (which, thanks to the rebate scam, is of no value to you).

Just another example of how consumers are so cynically squeezed dry.

Chris Leopold

Add your comment

  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br> <img>
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.

More information about formatting options

You must be logged in to comment
Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.